Washington State Investment Board

Sector

Financials

Headquarters

Olympia, United States

Official Website

sib.wa.gov

Climate Finance Policy Engagement Analysis

Climate Lobbying Overview: The Washington State Investment Board (WSIB) appears to have somewhat limited engagement on climate policy, generally supporting regulated corporate climate disclosure and policy to strengthen shareholder rights.

Top-Line Messaging on Climate-Related Finance Policy: In WSIB’s 2024 Sustainability Report it recognized the risks that climate change poses to investment portfolios, but did not clearly support real-world action to reduce emissions. In the same report, WSIB reported engaging with policymakers on ESG and climate issues, but did not take a clear position on the need for climate-related financial regulation.

Position on Regulated Corporate Climate Disclosure: WSIB appears supportive of regulated corporate climate disclosure. After the SEC released its proposed climate disclosure rule in 2022, WSIB commented in support of the proposal, including its greenhouse gas emissions reporting requirements. WSIB has reiterated this support in its 2022, 2023, and 2024 Sustainability Reports.

Position on Incorporating Climate Factors Into Investor Duties: The Washington State Treasurer, a member of WSIB’s board, has opposed “anti-ESG” efforts in the US. In 2022, the Treasurer signed onto the New York City Comptroller’s press release, opposing state-level “anti-ESG” legislation and asserting that states ignoring the risks of climate change “will fail to compete over the longer term horizon.” In 2023, the Treasurer applauded President Biden’s decision to veto legislation that would overturn a Department of Labor rule permitting fiduciaries to consider climate factors in investing.

Industry Association Governance: WSIB has disclosed its membership to the Council of Institutional Investors (CII), the only industry group to which InfluenceMap has tracked membership.

InfluenceMap collects and assesses evidence of corporate climate policy engagement on a weekly basis, depending on the availability of information from each specific data source (for more information see our methodology). While this analysis flows through to the company’s scores each week, the summary above is updated periodically. This summary was last updated in Q1 2025.

Show More

InfluenceMap Score for Climate Finance Policy Engagement

A-

Performance Band

84%

Organization Score

N/A

Relationship Score

5%

Engagement Intensity

Primary Evidence

All primary evidence used to inform the analysis of Washington State Investment Board can be found in the two tabs below below. In the first tab, hyperlinks in each cell of the matrix provide access to evidence collected on Washington State Investment Board's direct policy engagement activities. The second tab provides a record of any links between Washington State Investment Board and the Industry Associations stored in the LobbyMap database.

DATA SOURCES
QUERIES
Main Web Site

Main Web Site

Corporate Media

Corporate Media

CDP Responses

CDP Responses

Direct Consultation with Governments

Direct Consultation with Governments

Media Reports

Media Reports

CEO Messaging

CEO Messaging

Financial Disclosures

Financial Disclosures

Reforming the financial sector: Does the organization support the need for systemic reforms to deliver a sustainable financial system?

NSNSNSNSNSNSNS

Climate Science Stance: Does the organization support a science-based response to the climate crisis?

02NSNSNSNSNS

Need for climate policy: Does the organization support the need for climate-related finance regulation?

0NSNSNSNSNSNS

Disclosures: Does the organization support regulated corporate climate disclosure?

12NS2NSNSNS

Taxonomies: Does the organization support a taxonomy?

NSNSNSNSNSNSNS

Financial Products and Ratings: Does the organization support climate standards, labels and/or benchmarks for financial products and policy on ESG ratings?

NSNSNSNSNSNSNS

Investor Duties: Does the organization support policy to incorporate climate factors into investor duties?

12NS2NSNSNS

Prudential Regulation: Does the organization support policy to incorporate climate factors into risk management/ prudential regulation?

NSNSNSNSNSNSNS

Real Economy Climate Regulations: the organization support real economy climate policy and regulation?

NSNSNSNSNSNSNS

Energy, Industry and Land Transitions: Does the company support energy, industry and land transitions as required by the IPCC?

NSNSNSNSNSNSNS

Disclosure on Lobbying: Is the organization being transparent about their positions on climate legislation and policy?

1NSNSNSNSNSNS

Disclosure on Relationships: Are companies being transparent about their business associations which may impact climate debate and policy?

2NSNSNSNSNSNS