Council of Institutional Investors

Sector

Financials

Headquarters

Washington D.C., United States

Climate Finance Policy Engagement Analysis

Climate Lobbying Overview: The Council of Institutional Investors (CII) appears to be positively engaged on climate-related finance policy, generally supporting regulated corporate climate disclosure and advocating for shareholder rights. CII does not appear to have engaged on real economy climate policy or taken a position on energy, industry, or land transitions.

Top-Line Messaging on Climate-Related Finance Policy: CII does not appear to have taken clear positions on the need for reform to achieve a sustainable financial system, the need for action to combat climate change, or the need for government policy on climate finance.

Position on Regulated Corporate Climate Disclosure: CII appears generally supportive of regulated corporate climate disclosure, and on its website, accessed in May 2024, has listed mandatory climate risk disclosure as one of its 2024 advocacy priorities.When the SEC released its proposed climate disclosure framework in 2022, CII was generally supportive of the rules, asserting that the benefits of mandating Scope 3 emissions outweigh the costs, but advocating for the 1% threshold for financial metrics disclosure to be replaced by a materiality threshold. In a November 2023 article CII Executive Director Amy Borrus reiterated CII’s support for the rules and the SEC’s role in crafting them. In March 2024 CII tweeted in support of the SEC’s adoption of final disclosure rules.

Position on Incorporating Climate Factors Into Investor Duties: CII was a strong opponent of Trump-era regulations that sought to limit shareholder rights and ESG investing, asserting in 2020 comments that the regulations were driven by “lobbyists for corporate executives” that object to environmental or social shareholder proposals. In May 2021, CII supported the Biden Administration’s decision not to enforce the Trump-era shareholder and ESG investing rules, but in comments on regulation proposed by the Department of Labor to reverse its Trump-era rules CII asked that some language guiding ESG considerations be made less stringent. In August 2022, CII supported an SEC proposal that sought to strengthen shareholder rights.

Show More

InfluenceMap Score for Climate Finance Policy Engagement

A-

Performance Band

89%

Organization Score

7%

Engagement Intensity

Primary Evidence

All primary evidence used to inform the analysis of Council of Institutional Investors can be found in the two tabs below below. In the first tab, hyperlinks in each cell of the matrix provide access to evidence collected on Council of Institutional Investors's direct policy engagement activities. The second tab provides a record of any links between Council of Institutional Investors and the Industry Associations stored in the LobbyMap database.

DATA SOURCES
QUERIES
Main Web Site

Main Web Site

Corporate Media

Corporate Media

CDP Responses

CDP Responses

Direct Consultation with Governments

Direct Consultation with Governments

Media Reports

Media Reports

CEO Messaging

CEO Messaging

Financial Disclosures

Financial Disclosures

Reforming the financial sector: Does the organization support the need for systemic reforms to deliver a sustainable financial system?

NSNSNANSNSNSNA

Climate Science Stance: Does the organization support a science-based response to the climate crisis?

NSNSNANSNSNSNA

Need for climate policy: Does the organization support the need for climate-related finance regulation?

NSNSNANSNSNSNA

Disclosures: Does the organization support regulated corporate climate disclosure?

11NA1NS1NA

Taxonomies: Does the organization support a taxonomy?

NSNSNANSNSNSNA

Financial Products and Ratings: Does the organization support climate standards, labels and/or benchmarks for financial products and policy on ESG ratings?

NSNSNANSNSNSNA

Investor Duties: Does the organization support policy to incorporate climate factors into investor duties?

NS2NA2NSNSNA

Prudential Regulation: Does the organization support policy to incorporate climate factors into risk management/ prudential regulation?

NSNSNANSNSNSNA

Real Economy Climate Regulations: the organization support real economy climate policy and regulation?

NSNSNANSNSNSNA

Energy, Industry and Land Transitions: Does the company support energy, industry and land transitions as required by the IPCC?

NSNSNANSNSNSNA

Disclosure on Lobbying: Is the organization being transparent about their positions on climate legislation and policy?

2NSNANSNSNSNS

Disclosure on Relationships: Are companies being transparent about their business associations which may impact climate debate and policy?

2NSNANSNSNSNS