Repsol

InfluenceMap Score
for Climate Policy Engagement
D
Performance Band
46%
Organization Score
51%
Relationship Score
Sector:
Energy
Head​quarters:
Madrid, Spain
Brands and Associated Companies:
Petronor
Official Web Site:
Wikipedia:

Climate Policy Engagement Overview: Despite support for top-line climate targets, Repsol appears to be predominantly negative in its engagement with climate policy. The company has also advocated for the long-term role of fossil gas in the energy mix.

Top-line Messaging on Climate Policy: Repsol appears broadly supportive of climate policy in its top-line messaging. In its Climate Policy Positions publication, published July 2023, the company stated that it supported limiting global temperature increase to well below 2ºC, with efforts to limit increase to 1.5°C. In the same publication, Repsol appeared to support the goals of the UN Paris Agreement and carbon pricing measures to achieve net zero emissions.

Engagement with Climate-Related Regulations: Repsol appears to have taken predominantly negative positions on specific policies to reduce emissions. In a May 2023 consultation response, the company appeared to advocate to weaken the EU heavy-duty vehicle CO2 emission standards. In April 2022 public comments, Repsol did not appear to support the EU Methane Regulation for the energy sector, by advocating against leak detection and repair standards and flaring requirements.

Repsol does not appear to support specific carbon pricing policies in the economy, For example, in a November 2021 consultation response on the EU’s Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM), Repsol appeared to support the policy while continuing to advocate for the free allowances and the continuation of existing carbon leakage protection measures under the EU Emission Trading Scheme (EU ETS) until 2030 or later. In a different November 2021 consultation response, Repsol also appeared to oppose a cross-sectoral correction factor being applied to the EU ETS and the reduction of free allowances, adding that the ‘unrealistic’ tightening of EU ETS benchmarks could weaken carbon leakage protection.

The company also appears to be negatively engaged on other forms of climate regulation. Repsol also responded to a consultation on the EU’s Energy Efficiency Directive (EED) in November 2021, in which it did not support the exclusion of fossil gas counting towards energy saving obligations and did not appear to support any binding targets. Further, in a November 2021 consultation response, Repsol supported the Renewable Energy Directive (RED) with major exceptions, advocating for a technology-neutral approach and for recycled carbon fuels to be allowed for compliance.

Positioning on Energy Transition: Repsol appears to be supporting a continued role for fossil fuels in the energy mix. In the company’s Climate Policy Positions publication, published in July 2023, it appeared to advocate for the role of fossil gas to replace coal power, without clear conditions for CCS or methane emissions abatement. Repsol chairman Antonio Brufau Niubó, labelled the replacement of fossil fuels as “hasty and unrealistic” and supported the long-term role of oil and gas in the company’s 2022 Integrated Management Report, published in February 2023.

Repsol does not appear to support the decarbonization of the transport sector. For example, Repsol CEO Josu Jon Imaz advocated for Spain to overturn its ban on new fossil gas investments and opposed the Spanish government’s 2035 phase-out target for internal combustion engine (ICE) vehicles in a March 2023 La Vanguardia article. The company also signed a February 2023 joint statement which supported the long-term role of ICE heavy-duty vehicles.

Industry Association Governance: Repsol published a review of its industry association links in July 2022 and has not published an update in 2023. In the review, it has listed its membership to industry associations it holds a membership with, including details of the type of membership held, but with limited details of how the company influences or attempts to influence their climate change policy positions. The review excludes the company’s membership to Canadian Association of Petroleum Producers (CAPP), an association that negatively lobbies on climate-related policy. Nevertheless, the company identified one case of partial misalignment with the American Petroleum Institute (API), as it did in its 2021 and 2020 reviews. However, it continues to hold a membership with API despite evidence of consistently negative positions on climate policy and the energy mix. Repsol also retains memberships to other industry associations that lobby negatively on climate-related policy, such as BusinessEurope and FuelsEurope.

A detailed assessment of the company's corporate review on climate policy engagement can be found on InfluenceMap's CA100+ Investor Hub here.

InfluenceMap collects and assesses evidence of corporate climate policy engagement on a weekly basis, depending on the availability of information from each specific data source (for more information see our methodology). While this analysis flows through to the company’s scores each week, the summary above is updated periodically. This summary was last updated in Q3 2023.

QUERIES
DATA SOURCES
1NSNSNSNSNSNS
120210NS
00NSNS10NS
1NSNSNSNS1NS
-1NA1NANANANS
NS-11-1NS1NS
NS-1-1-1NS1NS
0NS-1-1NSNSNS
NSNS00NSNSNS
00-1-1NS-1NS
0-10-12-1NS
-1NS-1NANANANS
0NSNS0NSNSNS
Strength of Relationship
STRONG
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
WEAK
 
49%
 
49%
 
61%
 
61%
 
23%
 
23%
 
52%
 
52%
 
41%
 
41%
 
41%
 
41%
 
55%
 
55%
 
36%
 
36%
 
38%
 
38%
 
47%
 
47%
 
60%
 
60%
 
49%
 
49%
 
44%
 
44%
 
86%
 
86%
 
48%
 
48%
 
65%
 
65%
 
62%
 
62%
 
67%
 
67%
 
59%
 
59%

How to Read our Relationship Score Map

In this section, we depict graphically the relationships the corporation has with trade associations, federations, advocacy groups and other third parties who may be acting on their behalf to influence climate change policy. Each of the columns above represents one relationship the corporation appears to have with such a third party. In these columns, the top, dark section represents the strength of the relationship the corporation has with the influencer. For example if a corporation's senior executive also held a key role in the trade association, we would deem this to be a strong relationship and it would be on the far left of the chart above, with the weaker ones to the right. Click on these grey shaded upper sections for details of these relationships. The middle section contains a link to the organization score details of the influencer concerned, so you can see the details of its climate change policy influence. Click on the middle sections for for details of the trade associations. The lower section contains the organization score of that influencer, the lower the more negatively it is influencing climate policy.