L'Oréal

InfluenceMap Score
B-
Performance Band
76%
Organisation Score
58%
Relationship Score
Sector:
Consumer Staples
Head​quarters:
Clichy, France
Brands and Associated Companies:
Garnier, Maybelline, Ombrelle, The Body Shop
Official Web Site:
Wikipedia:

Climate Lobbying Overview: L'Oreal appears to be broadly supportive of climate policy, but does not appear to be directly engaging with most climate-related regulations. The company’s recent climate-related engagement appears to be limited to participation in open letters.

Top-line Messaging on Climate Policy: L’Oreal supports government regulation to tackle climate change. In 2020, its CEO Jean-Paul Agon signed an open letter calling for stimulus measures to deliver agreen recovery from Covid-19 ahead of an EU leaders’ meeting on recovery plans. L’Oreal also supports drastic action in line with the scientific advice on climate change, stating support in a 2019 press release for maintaining global temperature rise within 1.5 degrees. The company also opposed the US’ withdrawal from the Paris Agreement in a 2019 ‘United For The Paris Agreement’ joint letter signed by the CEO.

Engagement with Climate-Related Regulations: L’Oreal CEO Jean-Paul Agon signed a joint letter to the European Council in 2020 supporting an increased EU GHG emissions reduction target of 55% by 2030, up from Europe’s previous 40% target. InfluenceMap did not find any other recent evidence of engagement with climate-related regulations.

Positioning on Energy Transition: InfluenceMap did not find recent evidence of any engagement on the energy transition from L’Oreal.

Industry Association Governance: L’Oreal lacks a dedicated, clearly identifiable disclosure of its engagement with industry associations, nor does it publish an audit disclosure of its alignment on climate change policy with its industry associations. However, the company did submit a disclosure of industry association links via CDP in 2020. L’Oreal is a member of two associations that traditionally lobby negatively on climate change policy, including Mouvement des Entreprises de France (MEDEF) and Federation of German Industries (BDI).

QUERIES
DATA SOURCES
NS1NANSNS1NS
02NSNS22NS
NANSNSNSNS1NS
11NANSNS1NS
-2NA-1NANANANS
NSNSNS1NSNSNS
NSNSNSNSNSNSNS
NS2NSNSNSNSNS
NSNS1NS1NSNS
NS2NSNSNS0NS
NS2NS212NS
-2NS0NANANANS
NSNSNSNSNSNSNS
Strength of Relationship
STRONG
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
WEAK
 
66%
 
66%
 
48%
 
48%
 
70%
 
70%
 
44%
 
44%
 
73%
 
73%

How to Read our Relationship Score Map

In this section, we depict graphically the relationships the corporation has with trade associations, federations, advocacy groups and other third parties who may be acting on their behalf to influence climate change policy. Each of the columns above represents one relationship the corporation appears to have with such a third party. In these columns, the top, dark section represents the strength of the relationship the corporation has with the influencer. For example if a corporation's senior executive also held a key role in the trade association, we would deem this to be a strong relationship and it would be on the far left of the chart above, with the weaker ones to the right. Click on these grey shaded upper sections for details of these relationships. The middle section contains a link to the organization score details of the influencer concerned, so you can see the details of its climate change policy influence. Click on the middle sections for for details of the trade associations. The lower section contains the organization score of that influencer, the lower the more negatively it is influencing climate policy.