Dominion Energy

InfluenceMap Score
D+
Performance Band
55%
Organisation Score
44%
Relationship Score
Sector:
Utilities
Head​quarters:
Richmond, United States
Brands and Associated Companies:
Dominion Generation, Dominion Energy, Dominion Exploration and Production
Official Web Site:

Climate Lobbying Overview: Dominion Energy appears to be engaging with mixed positions on U.S. climate policy on the federal and state level. Although the company states support for decarbonization targets, it has been critical of the Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative emissions trading scheme. Dominion’s opposition to fossil gas bans is reflective of its membership to the American Gas Association, which has led a campaign since 2019 to preempt electrification mandates, as well as the Edison Electric Institute, which continues to lobby for the long-term role of fossil gas in the energy mix.

Top-line Messaging on Climate Policy: Dominion appears to demonstrate limited and mixed top-line messaging on climate policy. During infrastructure bill negotiations in July 2021, Dominion signed a joint letter with C2ES to Congress advocating for “ambitious, durable climate policy.” According to its Q3 2021 Senate Lobbying Disclosure, Dominion has been lobbying on the Build Back Better Act, although it is unclear how the company is engaging on the bill or if the engagement relates to the bill’s climate provisions. In a March 2021 letter with the CEO Climate Dialogue, Dominion advocated to President Biden to set ambitious NDC emissions targets for 2030 and 2050. Dominion has stated support for the Paris Agreement, most recently in its 2021 Climate Report.

Engagement with Climate-Related Policy:Dominion demonstrates mixed positions on federal and state renewable energy policies. The company supported the reinstatement of the California waiver for vehicle emissions standards in joint comments to the EPA in July 2021, emphasizing that a failure to do this could risk more stringent standards for other parts of the economy, specifically electric generating units. In April 2021, Dominion advocated to FERC to revise the Minimum Offer Price Rule (MOPR) to incentivize the uptake of renewable resources. In its CDP 2021 Climate Change report, Dominion states support for the 2020 Virginia Clean Economy Act, which sets a renewable portfolio standard of 100% by 2045 for the company and includes provisions for energy efficiency. In November 2019, Dominion submitted joint comments to the EPA advocating for federal methane emissions standards.

After Virginia governor-elect Youngkin pledged in December 2021 to withdraw the state from RGGI, Dominion reiterated its opposition to the emissions scheme, stating that it would result in “no real mitigation of emissions regionally.” Although Dominion advocated in May 2019 for a price on carbon with the CEO Climate Dialogue, the company disclosed in its CDP 2021 Climate Change report that it remains undecided on carbon tax policy.

Positioning on Energy Transition: Dominion appears to be supporting a long-term role for fossil gas in the energy mix, with a focus on introducing gas ban preemption bills in Ohio and Utah. Dominion describes its state-level efforts to promote fossil gas in its July 2021 Climate Report, stating that the company is engaging with policymakers to “preserve customers’ ability to use natural gas.” According to February 2020 email communications records obtained by the Energy News Network, Dominion corresponded with representatives from other companies and trade associations, including the American Gas Association, American Petroleum Institute, and several other utilities, to build support for fossil gas ban preemption legislation in Ohio. Dominion has also participated in other coalitions, according to the Guardian in August 2020, to block electrification in Ohio and possibly other jurisdictions. Dominion’s 2021 Ohio lobbying reports shows that the utility has engaged, albeit with an unstated position, on the state gas ban preemption bills, including House Bill 201 which became effective in September 2021. The company also appears to have engaged on the Utah gas ban preemption bill, as reported by Pew Charitable Trusts in January 2022. Dominion also appears to be supporting fossil fuel infrastructure in other states: in November 2020, the LA Times reported that Dominion Energy was a funder of the Western States and Tribal Nations, an advocacy group promoting fossil fuel projects in Mexico and the western United States.

On the other hand, Dominion engages with mostly positive positions on state and federal decarbonization targets. For example, in March 2021, Dominion testified in support of Connecticut Senate Bill 882, which aims to decarbonize the state power sector by 2040. In November 2021, E&E News reported that Dominion was still broadly supportive of the clean energy provisions in the Build Back Better Act. Previously, in a May 2021 earnings call, CEO Robert Blue suggested that the company was engaging directly with federal policymakers on shaping the administration’s decarbonization policies. Dominion states support for the transportation of electrification in its 2020 Sustainability and Corporate Responsibility Report, although the company’s 2021 federal lobbying reports reveal engagement on “natural gas vehicles” and “electric vehicles” without disclosing a clear position.

Industry Association Governance: Dominion has disclosed a list of trade associations on its corporate website to which it pays membership dues, but has not disclosed details on each association’s climate change policy positions. The company notes on its “Political Contributions” webpage that it will release a trade association review sometime in 2022. Dominion is a member of several U.S. associations that have a history of strategic opposition to climate policy, including the National Association of Manufacturers and the US Chamber of Commerce. The company is also a member of the Edison Electric Institute and the American Gas Association, which hold generally mixed and negative positions on climate policy, respectively. Regarding recent engagements on the Biden administration reconciliation bill, Edison Electric Institute has offered mixed support for climate provisions and the American Gas Association has lobbied against the proposed methane fee.

QUERIES
DATA SOURCES
00NSNS-1NSNS
11NS2NS00
0111101
11NS211NS
-1NA-1NANANANS
NSNS0NS00NS
NSNS00-2-2NS
NSNS20NSNSNS
0NS22-111
0020-10NS
0-101020
0NS-1NANANANS
Strength of Relationship
STRONG
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
WEAK
 
29%
 
29%
 
31%
 
31%
 
92%
 
92%
 
28%
 
28%
 
58%
 
58%
 
42%
 
42%

How to Read our Relationship Score Map

In this section, we depict graphically the relationships the corporation has with trade associations, federations, advocacy groups and other third parties who may be acting on their behalf to influence climate change policy. Each of the columns above represents one relationship the corporation appears to have with such a third party. In these columns, the top, dark section represents the strength of the relationship the corporation has with the influencer. For example if a corporation's senior executive also held a key role in the trade association, we would deem this to be a strong relationship and it would be on the far left of the chart above, with the weaker ones to the right. Click on these grey shaded upper sections for details of these relationships. The middle section contains a link to the organization score details of the influencer concerned, so you can see the details of its climate change policy influence. Click on the middle sections for for details of the trade associations. The lower section contains the organization score of that influencer, the lower the more negatively it is influencing climate policy.