Invest Europe

Sector

Financials

Headquarters

Brussels, Belgium

Official Website

investeurope.eu

Wikipedia

Invest Europe

Climate Finance Policy Engagement Analysis

Climate Lobbying Overview: Invest Europe appears to have fairly limited engagement on sustainable finance policy, but does not appear to support stringent regulatory intervention.

Top-line Messaging on Climate-Related Financial Policy: Invest Europe has stated support for the EU's net zero by 2050 target in its 2021 Climate Ambition Statement, however has also appeared to suggest that voluntary action by the private equity sector is largely sufficient in addressing sustainability risks. In feedback to the European Supervisory Authorities (ESAs) on greenwashing in 2023, Invest Europe highlighted that market participants should not be penalized for having taken a “wrong” view regarding regulation and that greenwashing does "not warrant its own regime".

Position on Regulated Corporate Climate Disclosure: In feedback to the European Commission in 2020, Invest Europe was cautious about the review of the Non-Financial Reporting Directive (NFRD), arguing against the expansion of the scope to SMEs and private investments and opposing mandatory standardized disclosure. However, it welcomed the proposal by the Commission in 2021 on the Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD), emphasizing that it should be aligned and compatible with legislation already in place, such as the SFDR and that it should follow the materiality and proportionality principles.

Position on Taxonomies, and Climate Standards and Labels: In a 2022 response to ESMA, Invest Europe opposed efforts to introduce quantitative thresholds for fund names using ESG or sustainability-related terms, arguing that the introduction of these guidelines is not “within the powers of ESMA”. In meeting minutes from a January 2023 meeting between ESMA and Invest Europe on the same guidelines, Invest Europe requested a longer transition period for close ended funds, while it requested a grandfathering provision exempting close-ended funds in a 2024 letter to ESMA. In feedback to the Platform on Sustainable Finance proposal for an extended taxonomy, Invest Europe suggested that a significantly harmful taxonomy ‘could be useful’, however should not be a priority and could potentially restrict funding from transitioning businesses.

Position on Integrating Climate into Investor Duties: In a 2023 response on EU Sustainable Finance Disclosure Regulation (SFDR), Invest Europe did not support Principal Adverse Impacts (PAI) disclosures for Article 8, proposed widening the definition of 'sustainable investment' to include transitioning products, supported removal of website disclosures and entity level PAI disclosures, and did not support minimum binding targets for proportion of sustainable investments. In a letter to the Commission during in 2023, Invest Europe did not support the disclosure requirements on alternative investment funds under Article 10 of the SFDR.

Show More

InfluenceMap Score for Climate Finance Policy Engagement

D+

Performance Band

52%

Organization Score

10%

Engagement Intensity

Primary Evidence

All primary evidence used to inform the analysis of Invest Europe can be found in the two tabs below below. In the first tab, hyperlinks in each cell of the matrix provide access to evidence collected on Invest Europe's direct policy engagement activities. The second tab provides a record of any links between Invest Europe and the Industry Associations stored in the LobbyMap database.

DATA SOURCES
QUERIES
Main Web Site

Main Web Site

Corporate Media

Corporate Media

CDP Responses

CDP Responses

Direct Consultation with Governments

Direct Consultation with Governments

Media Reports

Media Reports

CEO Messaging

CEO Messaging

Financial Disclosures

Financial Disclosures

Reforming the financial sector: Does the organization support the need for systemic reforms to deliver a sustainable financial system?

NSNSNA1NS0NS

Climate Science Stance: Does the organization support a science-based response to the climate crisis?

20NANSNSNSNS

Need for climate policy: Does the organization support the need for climate-related finance regulation?

00NA-1NS0NS

Disclosures: Does the organization support regulated corporate climate disclosure?

NS0NA0NSNSNS

Taxonomies: Does the organization support a taxonomy?

00NA000NS

Financial Products and Ratings: Does the organization support climate standards, labels and/or benchmarks for financial products and policy on ESG ratings?

NSNSNA-1NSNSNS

Investor Duties: Does the organization support policy to incorporate climate factors into investor duties?

NS0NA-10NSNS

Prudential Regulation: Does the organization support policy to incorporate climate factors into risk management/ prudential regulation?

NSNSNANSNSNSNS

Real Economy Climate Regulations: the organization support real economy climate policy and regulation?

NSNSNANSNSNSNS

Energy, Industry and Land Transitions: Does the company support energy, industry and land transitions as required by the IPCC?

NSNSNANSNSNSNS

Disclosure on Lobbying: Is the organization being transparent about their positions on climate legislation and policy?

2NSNANSNSNSNS

Disclosure on Relationships: Are companies being transparent about their business associations which may impact climate debate and policy?

2NSNANSNSNSNS