A new batch of industry associations has been uploaded onto the InfluenceMap system and the relationship scores recalculated accordingly.
We adjusted the terminology used to describe the queries running down the left-hand side of our scoring matrix and added additional explanatory text to the info-boxes. This has no impact on the scores and methodology. It has been done following user feedback to improve clarity.
Climate Lobbying Overview: The Federation of German Industries (BDI) is strategically engaged on climate change policy in the EU and Germany. The organization's top-line statements on climate policy have improved since 2018, but it appears to remain negatively engaged on key strands of EU climate policy, such as the Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM), the reform of the EU Emissions Trading Scheme (ETS), and CO2 Standards for Light Duty Vehicles. The association has extensively promoted fossil gas in the energy mix.
Top-line Messaging on Climate Policy: BDI's top-line messaging on climate policy is mixed. In an April 2020 position paper, the association seemed to support the EU Climate Law, which sets a target of climate neutrality by 2050 in the EU, with the caveats that the law must maintain competitiveness and economic protections, while warning against a “one-sided approach”. In a March 2021 position paper on the EU Fit for 55 package, BDI maintained that competitiveness and carbon leakage protection should be incorporated in future climate policy. It also did not support the ‘Fit for 55’ package proposals in a November 2021 briefing, describing them as “massively price-increasing” without carbon leakage protections. Furthermore, in a May 2021 consultation response BDI did not support increasing the ambition of Germany's climate neutrality to 2045, questioning its feasibility and arguing that it would lessen ambition among other European nations. However, in a November 2021 briefing the association appeared to accept the new target. The association has communicated support for the Paris Agreement goals and criticized the lack of progress made at COP26 in a Handelsblatt article in November 2021.
Engagement with Climate-Related Regulations: BDI’s overall engagement with climate-related regulations in the EU appears to be mostly negative. The association opposed the European Commission’s proposal to raise the EU’s 2030 GHG reduction target from 40% to 50-55% on its website in April 2020.
In November 2021 in response to an EU public consultation, BDI opposed the EU's carbon border adjustment mechanism (CBAM), describing the proposal as "premature" and stating its position as "generally skeptical to the unilateral introduction of CBAMs", advocating for the continuation of the free allocation of emissions allowances in the EU ETS until 2030 and supporting participation in the CBAM on a voluntary basis. Additionally, in an EU public consultation response in November 2021, BDI appeared to take a negative position on the reform of the EU ETS, emphasizing the threat of carbon leakage and advocating for the continuation of protection measures such as indirect cost compensation. It also did not support the tightening of the Market Stability Reserve to remove surplus allowances. In a September 2021 position paper BDI also appeared to not support the expansion of the EU ETS to cover international aviation, and advocated for continuing free emissions allowances for certain intra-EU flights. Furthermore, in November 2021 in response to an EU public consultation, BDI opposed the proposed zero emission standard within the EU CO2 Standards for Light Duty Vehicles, stating that “German industry rejects a de facto ban on vehicles with internal combustion engines.”
The association supports incentives for energy efficiency, however appears to oppose stronger regulation. In a September 2021 briefing BDI supported tax subsidies for energy efficiency in Germany, but argued that regulation should be considered a “last resort” in an October 2021 briefing. In a November 2021 report, the association did not support proposed reforms to the EU Energy Efficiency Directive, advocating for a review of the definition of "energy efficiency", and arguing that the proposed energy savings target of 1.5% was "unrealistic."
Positioning on Energy Transition: BDI likewise appears to be positioned against decisive action to transition the energy mix, and has been highly supportive of an increased role for fossil gas in Europe. In a January 2022 press release, BDI President Siegfried Russworm supported "massive" fossil gas expansion in Germany without placing conditions on the need for CCS. The association subsequently supported the inclusion of fossil gas in the EU Sustainable Finance Taxonomy in a February 2022 press release. Also in February 2022, the association’s president Siegfried Russwurm reportedly questioned whether Germany could bring forward the phase-out of coal in a Handelsblatt article. This follows a November 2021 report in which the association did not support the proposed change of taxation for fossil gas in the Energy Taxation Directive, stating that it would "jeopardize the competitiveness of energy intensive industry."
Siegfried Russwurm previously seemed to support Nord Stream 2 in a Handelsblatt interview in January 2021, a new fossil gas pipeline set to be built in the EU. Following the Russian invasion of Ukraine, Siegfried Russwurm was quoted in a February 2022 Handelsblatt interview questioning the feasibility of bringing forward the phase-out of coal without endangering security of energy supply. However, in a March 2022 briefing the association supported the decarbonization of industry, advocating for carbon contracts for difference to aid industrial decarbonization in steel, cement and chemical products. In a December 2021 press release, BDI supported the decarbonization of transport via rail and the transition to a low-carbon energy sector via renewable hydrogen, although it advocated for "pragmatic" regulations on what hydrogen is considered sustainable.