Croplife America

Sector

Chemicals

Headquarters

Arlington, United States

Official Website

croplifeamerica.org

Biodiversity Policy Engagement Analysis

Biodiversity Lobbying Overview: CropLife America has taken mostly negative positions in its engagement on biodiversity related regulations.

Top-line Messaging on Biodiversity Loss: CropLife America does not appear to have taken positions on the science of biodiversity loss, the need to address biodiversity loss or the need for regulation on the issue.

Engagement with Biodiversity-Related Regulations: CropLife America has mostly engaged on policies related to pollution, with predominantly negative positions.

Since at least 2018, CropLife America has extensively engaged on neonicotinoids. CropLife America appeared not to support the draft biological evaluation for acetamiprid (a neonicotinoid pesticide) in an October 2021 comment and in a December 2023 comment. CropLife America is a signatory of a March 2023 letter to the U.S. House of Representatives and United States Senate, opposing Senate Bill S.269: Protect America's Children from Toxic Pesticides Act, which would ban neonicotinoids and paraquat and impose more stringent criteria for pesticide approval.

On its corporate website, accessed in June 2022, CropLife America appeared to support the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA) by stating that it“supports a robust stakeholder process to build consensus around, and sufficient resources to implement, a better process to protect species and provide growers the tools they need”. However, CropLife America has submitted multiple comments to the Environmental Protection Agency advocating against policies related to pesticides. In a May 2023 comment, CropLife America expressed concerns over the draft biological opinion on carbaryl and methomyl (pesticides). CropLife America appeared not to support the Environmental Protection Agency's Draft Herbicide Strategy Framework, which aims to reduce the impact of conventional agricultural herbicides on federally listed endangered and threatened species, as well as their designated critical habitats, in an October 2023 comment.

Positioning on Statutory Protection of Wildlife: CropLife America appears to have limited engagement on the statutory protection of wildlife. In an August 2023 comment, CropLife America appeared to support weakening the proposed requirements to offset "incidental take" of endangered species.

Show More

InfluenceMap Score for Biodiversity Policy Engagement

E+

Performance Band

39%

Organization Score

16%

Engagement Intensity

Primary Evidence

All primary evidence used to inform the analysis of Croplife America can be found in the two tabs below below. In the first tab, hyperlinks in each cell of the matrix provide access to evidence collected on Croplife America's direct policy engagement activities. The second tab provides a record of any links between Croplife America and the Industry Associations stored in the LobbyMap database.

DATA SOURCES
QUERIES
Main Web Site

Main Web Site

Social Media

Social Media

CDP Responses

CDP Responses

Legislative Consultations

Legislative Consultations

Media Reports

Media Reports

CEO Messaging

CEO Messaging

Financial Disclosures

Financial Disclosures

Transparency over biodiversity loss

NS-1NANSNSNSNA

Stance over biodiversity loss

NSNSNANSNSNSNA

Need for biodiversity policy

NSNSNANSNS0NA

UN Convention on Biological Diversity

NSNSNANSNSNSNA

Land use change

NSNSNA-1NSNSNA

Overexploitation

NSNSNANSNSNSNA

Invasive species

NSNSNANSNSNSNA

Pollution

-1-1NA-1-1-1NA

Endangered species legislation

0-1NA-1NS0NA

Transparency on legislation

2NANANANANANA

Transparency over indirect influence

2NANANANANANA