Bank Policy Institute (BPI)

Sector

Banks

Headquarters

Washington DC, United States

Official Website

bpi.com

Climate Finance Policy Engagement Analysis

Climate Lobbying Overview: The Bank Policy Institute (BPI) has been actively engaged on climate-related financial policy in the US, opposing efforts to regulate corporate climate disclosure and incorporate climate risk into prudential regulation.

Top-Line Messaging on Climate-Related Financial Policy: In several different blog posts, BPI has contested the assertion that climate change poses a risk to the stability of the financial system. In a 2022 post, BPI wrote that climate scenario analysis “calls into question” whether climate risks are material for banks. In 2024, a BPI blog post asserted that climate risks “do not rise to the level of capital risks for banks.”

Position on Regulated Corporate Climate Disclosure: BPI has repeatedly opposed corporate climate disclosure policies. After the SEC proposed its climate disclosure rule in March 2022, BPI issued a press release stating that the proposal was overly ambitious, and urged the SEC to proceed in a more “measured” manner. In its letter to the Commission in June 2022, BPI outlined several objections to the proposed climate disclosure rule, including Scope 3 disclosure requirements and several qualitative and quantitative risk disclosure provisions. In July 2022 BPI commented its objections to the International Sustainability Standards Board (ISSB) draft climate disclosure standards, and in an October 2022 press release BPI opposed the ISSB’s decision to include Scope 3 emissions in its global baseline for climate-related disclosure. BPI also opposed California emissions disclosure bills in a 2022 letter to the California State Assembly and a 2023 letter to the bill’s sponsor.

Position on Incorporating Climate Factors Into Risk Management/Prudential Regulation: BPI has been generally unsupportive of climate-related prudential regulation, repeatedly taking the position that banks are already managing climate-related risks in a prudent manner. A 2022 blog post suggested that regulatory efforts to incorporate climate risk into risk management supervision are unnecessary, given that banks are “well-placed to manage climate-related financial risks.” In its 2022 and 2023 comments on proposed climate-related financial risk management principles from US banking regulators including the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC), the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC), and the Federal Reserve, BPI opposed “overly prescriptive” risk management requirements and opposed a requirement for banks’ boards to assure that public statements on climate strategies and commitments are consistent with internal strategies and risk appetite. In 2023 comments to the New York Department of Financial Services BPI supported the Department’s “flexible approach” to its proposed climate risk management guidance but opposed any new regulation and objected to climate-related board and management responsibilities. BPI has also engaged with proposed guidance from the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (BCBS) which is likely to inform government policy. In a 2024 letter, BPI objected to the BCBS proposed climate disclosure standards for bank supervisors, asserting that climate strategy, emissions, and physical risk exposure are outside the scope of Basel Pillar 3 disclosures which are intended to address financial risk and capital adequacy.

Show More

InfluenceMap Score for Climate Finance Policy Engagement

C-

Performance Band

58%

Organization Score

12%

Engagement Intensity

Primary Evidence

All primary evidence used to inform the analysis of Bank Policy Institute (BPI) can be found in the two tabs below below. In the first tab, hyperlinks in each cell of the matrix provide access to evidence collected on Bank Policy Institute (BPI)'s direct policy engagement activities. The second tab provides a record of any links between Bank Policy Institute (BPI) and the Industry Associations stored in the LobbyMap database.

DATA SOURCES
QUERIES
Main Web Site

Main Web Site

Corporate Media

Corporate Media

CDP Responses

CDP Responses

Direct Consultation with Governments

Direct Consultation with Governments

Media Reports

Media Reports

CEO Messaging

CEO Messaging

Financial Disclosures

Financial Disclosures

Reforming the financial sector: Does the organization support the need for systemic reforms to deliver a sustainable financial system?

NS-1NANSNSNSNA

Climate Science Stance: Does the organization support a science-based response to the climate crisis?

1NSNANSNSNSNA

Need for climate policy: Does the organization support the need for climate-related finance regulation?

00NANSNS-1NA

Disclosures: Does the organization support regulated corporate climate disclosure?

0-1NA-1-1NSNA

Taxonomies: Does the organization support a taxonomy?

1NSNANSNSNSNA

Financial Products and Ratings: Does the organization support climate standards, labels and/or benchmarks for financial products and policy on ESG ratings?

NSNSNANSNSNSNA

Investor Duties: Does the organization support policy to incorporate climate factors into investor duties?

NSNSNA222NA

Prudential Regulation: Does the organization support policy to incorporate climate factors into risk management/ prudential regulation?

0-1NA-1NS-1NA

Real Economy Climate Regulations: the organization support real economy climate policy and regulation?

NSNSNANSNSNSNA

Energy, Industry and Land Transitions: Does the company support energy, industry and land transitions as required by the IPCC?

NS-1NANSNSNSNA

Disclosure on Lobbying: Is the organization being transparent about their positions on climate legislation and policy?

2NSNANSNSNSNS

Disclosure on Relationships: Are companies being transparent about their business associations which may impact climate debate and policy?

1NSNANSNSNSNS