Association of Mining and Exploration Companies (AMEC)

セクター

金属・鉱業

Headquarters

Perth, Australia

Official Website

amec.org.au

Climate Policy Engagement Analysis

Climate Policy Engagement Overview: The Association of Mining and Exploration Companies (AMEC) is actively engaged on climate policy and displays a mix of positive and negative positions. While the association broadly supports circular economy principles in the mining industry and the decarbonization of the metals value-chain, it also appears to support technologies that risk slowing down the transition to renewables.

Top-line Messaging on Climate Policy: AMEC’s topline messaging on climate policy reflects a mix of positive and negative positions. The association communicates broad support for national commitments made under the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change and appears to support net zero emissions by 2050, as seen in an April 2024 consultation submission. However, AMEC also appears to argue against government regulation on climate change. For example, the association called on Australia to “carefully consider the economic impact of being an ‘outright’ climate leader” in a December 2023 consultation submission.

Engagement with Climate-Related Policy: AMEC’s engagement with climate related policy in Australia includes a mix of positive and negative positions, generally supporting circular economy principles while appearing to oppose greenhouse gas emissions regulations. The association consistently advocated against the introduction of a climate trigger in Australia’s Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act, as seen in its March 2024 submission to the Nature Positive consultation. Further, AMEC stressed difficulties for industry in navigating compliance with Australia’s Safeguard Mechanism (SGM) in a July 2024 consultation submission, following its earlier opposition to the SGM reforms in a February 2023 consultation submission.

However, AMEC broadly supports the implementation of circular economy principles in the mining industry, as seen in a December 2024 consultation submission to the South Australian Environment Protection Authority and also appeared to advocate for measures to increase recycled content in metal production in its July 2024 consultation submission on unlocking green metals opportunities for a Future Made in Australia.

Positioning on Energy Transition: AMEC displays a mix of positive and negative positions on the energy transition, broadly supporting the decarbonization of the metals value-chain while also appearing to support technologies that risk slowing down the transition to renewables. The association supported specific regulatory measures as part of the Future Made in Australia plan to facilitate the move to a net-zero resources industry in Australia in a July 2024 consultation submission to the Australian Parliament House. In addition, AMEC advocated for government policy and investment to accelerate the decarbonization of Australia’s electricity generation system to aid the development of a “full green metals value-chain” in a July 2024 consultation submission and further advocated for the addition of high-grade magnetite to Australia’s Critical Minerals List to facilitate low-carbon steel production in a December 2024 consultation submission.

However, AMEC also stated that “green industry projects” should not economically disadvantage the mining industry in a September 2024 consultation submission. The association appeared to support fossil gas and other “transitional technologies” alongside hydrogen in direct reduced iron processes without placing clear timelines on the use of fossil fuels or stating the need to fully decarbonize hydrogen production in its October 2024 consultation submission on South Australia’s green iron and steel strategy and called for government support to aid the decarbonization of coal and gas to ensure “they are responsibly mined for decades to come” in its December 2023 consultation submission on Queensland’s 2024 budget. Moreover, AMEC supports a future role for nuclear in the energy mix but is unclear as to how it sees its role in terms of a full transition towards a zero-emission energy system, for example in its August 2023 consultation submission on the update of Australia’s Critical Minerals List.

InfluenceMap collects and assesses evidence of corporate climate policy engagement on a weekly basis, depending on the availability of information from each specific data source (for more information see our methodology). While this analysis flows through to the association’s scores each week, the summary above is updated periodically.

This summary was last updated in Q1 2025.

Show More

InfluenceMap Score for Climate Policy Engagement

D

パフォーマンス・バンド

49%

組織スコア

19%

関与の度合い

Primary Evidence

All primary evidence used to inform the analysis of Association of Mining and Exploration Companies (AMEC) can be found in the two tabs below below. In the first tab, hyperlinks in each cell of the matrix provide access to evidence collected on Association of Mining and Exploration Companies (AMEC)'s direct policy engagement activities. The second tab provides a record of any links between Association of Mining and Exploration Companies (AMEC) and the Industry Associations stored in the LobbyMap database.

データ源
質疑
公式ホームページ

公式ホームページ

ソーシャルメディア

ソーシャルメディア

CDPレポート

CDPレポート

政府への提出資料・発言

政府への提出資料・発言

メディア報道・記事

メディア報道・記事

代表取締役・会長メッセージ

代表取締役・会長メッセージ

事業会計報告

事業会計報告

気候変動科学の認識

1NSNA10NSNS

気候変動に対する対応

2NSNS1NS0NS

気候変動対策における規制措置への見解

-1NSNS-1NS-1NS

国連気候変動枠組条約への見解

1NSNS1NSNSNS

気候変動政策に対する見解の明確度

2NANANANANANS

Carbon Tax

NSNSNA0-2-1NS

排出権取引への見解

NSNSNA-1NSNSNS

エネルギー効率基準法への見解

NSNSNA1NSNSNS

再生可能エネルギー法への見解

NSNSNA-1NS0NS

エネルギー政策への見解

-10NA0-10NS

温室効果ガス排出基準への見解

-1NSNA-1-2-1NS

関係・関与性における情報開示

1NANANANANANS

Land Use

NSNSNSNSNSNSNS