Whitehaven Coal

InfluenceMap Score
E
Performance Band
32%
Organisation Score
31%
Relationship Score
Sector:
Metals & Mining
Head​quarters:
Newcastle, Australia
Official Web Site:
Wikipedia:

Climate Lobbying Overview: Whitehaven Coal appears to be broadly opposed to ambitious action on climate change, albeit with relatively low engagement on specific climate-related policy. Whitehaven Coal does not appear to support the transition of the energy mix, showing strong support for a sustained role for coal in the energy mix.

Top-line Messaging on Climate Policy: Whitehaven Coal's top-line communications are mixed, however they have become more positive in 2021. In its 2021 Sustainability Report, published in August 2021, Whitehaven Coal appeared to support the goals of the Paris Agreement. The company also supported the Paris Agreement in an April 2021 response to a Parliamentary Inquiry on the regulation of Australia's export industries. Whitehaven Coal has previously appeared unsupportive of ambitious action on climate change in line with the IPCC. In its 2019 and 2020 Sustainability Reports, Whitehaven Coal appeared to prioritize energy security and economic development over emissions reductions. However, in its 2021 Sustainability Report, the company appeared to support limiting global temperature rise to two degrees celcius.

Engagement with Climate-Related Regulations: Whitehaven Coal appears to have limited transparency regarding its engagement with specific climate-related regulations, although the engagement found has been largely negative. In an April 2021 response to a Parliamentary Inquiry on the regulation of Australia's export industries, Whitehaven Coal appeared to oppose renewable subsidies in Australia. In its 2021 Sustainability Report, published in August 2021, the company also appeared to support general greenhouse gas emissions regulations.

Positioning on Energy Transition: Whitehaven Coal is continuing to strongly support a sustained role for coal in the energy mix. In its 2021 Sustainability Report, published in August 2021, the company supported a continued role for coal in the energy mix dependent on the deployment of Carbon Capture and Storage. However, Whitehaven Coal did not specifically support a reduction in the role for coal in line with the IPCC’s predicted role for coal. Additionally, in an April 2021 response to a Parliamentary Inquiry on the regulation of Australia's export industries, Whitehaven Coal supported a significant role for coal in the energy mix for decades, including new projects, and opposed moves to accelerate the energy transition by phasing out financial support for the coal sector. In its 2020 Sustainability Report, the company also supported New South Wales’ 2020 Strategic Statement on Coal Exploration and Mining, which advocates a long-term role for coal for “many decades” and new areas for exploration and mining.

Whitehaven Coal's leadership also advocates strongly in favor of coal's role in the energy mix. In response to Queensland's decision to remove a ten-year freeze on coal royalties, Whitehaven Coal CEO Paul Flynn opposed the policy change in a July 2022 Sydney Morning Herald article, stating that “It is clearly not a royalty, it’s a tax,”. Flynn also appeared to suggest that Whitehaven Coal would be engaging with the New South Wales government on its own coal royalty policies, and stated that the company would make sure the state "understands the critical role the resources sector plays". In October 2021, Chairman Mark Vaile called for continued investment in fossil fuels (including coal) for decades, emphasizing the risks to energy security of moving away from coal as part of Australia's net-zero push. In an August 2021 op-ed, CEO Paul Flynn argued that shutting down Australia's coal mines would make it "all but impossible" to achieve net-zero emissions as it would be replaced by lower-quality alternatives.

Industry Association Governance: Whitehaven Coal has disclosed its membership to some industry associations which are actively lobbying on climate change policy. However, the company has not published a dedicated review assessing climate policy alignment with its associations, nor has it disclosed how it is engaging with these groups on climate change. Whitehaven Coal has strong links to several industry associations that have actively opposed meaningful climate change policy in Australia, including sitting on the board of directors of the Minerals Council of Australia, Queensland Resource Council, and the NSW Minerals Council. Whitehaven Coal also sits on the executive committee of the World Coal Association (WCA) which has actively promoted coal in the global energy mix.

QUERIES
DATA SOURCES
1NSNANSNSNS1
0NSNSNS-1NSNS
1NSNSNSNSNSNS
1NSNS1NSNSNS
-2NA-2NANANANS
NS-2NSNSNS-2NS
NSNSNSNSNS-1NS
NSNSNSNSNSNSNS
NSNSNS-2NS-1NS
-2-2NS-2-2-2-2
1NSNSNSNSNSNS
-1NA-2NANANANS
NSNSNSNSNSNSNS
Strength of Relationship
STRONG
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
WEAK
 
38%
 
38%
 
29%
 
29%
 
27%
 
27%
 
31%
 
31%

How to Read our Relationship Score Map

In this section, we depict graphically the relationships the corporation has with trade associations, federations, advocacy groups and other third parties who may be acting on their behalf to influence climate change policy. Each of the columns above represents one relationship the corporation appears to have with such a third party. In these columns, the top, dark section represents the strength of the relationship the corporation has with the influencer. For example if a corporation's senior executive also held a key role in the trade association, we would deem this to be a strong relationship and it would be on the far left of the chart above, with the weaker ones to the right. Click on these grey shaded upper sections for details of these relationships. The middle section contains a link to the organization score details of the influencer concerned, so you can see the details of its climate change policy influence. Click on the middle sections for for details of the trade associations. The lower section contains the organization score of that influencer, the lower the more negatively it is influencing climate policy.