We have expanded the list of climate policies we assess company engagement with to incorporate land-use related policy, referring to legislative or regulatory measures to enhance and protect ecosystems and land where carbon is being stored. Assessments under this category are currently underweighted in terms of their contribution to the overall company metrics. This weighting will be progressively increased over the next 6 months.
We adjusted the terminology used to describe the queries running down the left-hand side of our scoring matrix and added additional explanatory text to the info-boxes. This has no impact on the scores and methodology. It has been done following user feedback to improve clarity.
InfluenceMap Data Point on Corporate - Influencer Relationship
(1 = weak, 10 = strong)
Cynthia Bolt, Salesforce Senior Vice President, Manufacturing, Automotive and Energy, is listed on the Board of Directors for NAM (as of December 2022)
Cynthia Bolt
--no extract--
InfluenceMap Data Point on Corporate - Influencer Relationship
(1 = weak, 10 = strong)
Cynthia Bolt, Salesforce Senior Vice President, Manufacturing, Automotive and Energy, is listed on the Board of Directors for NAM (as of December 2022)
Cynthia Bolt
--no extract--
InfluenceMap Data Point on Corporate - Influencer Relationship
(1 = weak, 10 = strong)
Salesforce executives serve on the Board of Directors and Advisory Board for CEBA (as of December 2022)
Max Scher
--no extract--
InfluenceMap Data Point on Corporate - Influencer Relationship
(1 = weak, 10 = strong)
Salesforce executives serve on the Board of Directors and Advisory Board for CEBA (as of December 2022)
Max Scher
--no extract--
InfluenceMap Data Point on Corporate - Influencer Relationship
(1 = weak, 10 = strong)
Salesforce Japan Co, Ltd is an executive member of the JCLP (as of August 2021)
not specified
--no extract--
InfluenceMap Data Point on Corporate - Influencer Relationship
(1 = weak, 10 = strong)
Salesforce Japan Co, Ltd is an executive member of the JCLP (as of August 2021)
not specified
--no extract--
InfluenceMap Data Point on Corporate - Influencer Relationship
(1 = weak, 10 = strong)
Salesforce is a member of the Business Council of Australia (as of December 2022)
not specified
--no extract--
InfluenceMap Data Point on Corporate - Influencer Relationship
(1 = weak, 10 = strong)
Salesforce is a member of the Business Council of Australia (as of December 2022)
not specified
--no extract--
InfluenceMap Data Point on Corporate - Influencer Relationship
(1 = weak, 10 = strong)
“The U.S. Chamber of Commerce’s position on the [$3.5 trillion] reconciliation package does not reflect Salesforce’s perspective on the need for immediate and bold climate action,” Patrick Flynn, the company’s head of global sustainability, said in a statement. “We are actively working to improve the Chamber’s position on climate.” (Politico, September 2021)
Patrick Flynn
InfluenceMap Data Point on Corporate - Influencer Relationship
(1 = weak, 10 = strong)
Salesforce is a member of the US Chamber of Commerce (as of April 2021)
not specified
InfluenceMap Data Point on Corporate - Influencer Relationship
(1 = weak, 10 = strong)
“The U.S. Chamber of Commerce’s position on the [$3.5 trillion] reconciliation package does not reflect Salesforce’s perspective on the need for immediate and bold climate action,” Patrick Flynn, the company’s head of global sustainability, said in a statement. “We are actively working to improve the Chamber’s position on climate.” (Politico, September 2021)
Patrick Flynn
InfluenceMap Data Point on Corporate - Influencer Relationship
(1 = weak, 10 = strong)
Salesforce is a member of the US Chamber of Commerce (as of April 2021)
not specified
InfluenceMap Data Point on Corporate - Influencer Relationship
(1 = weak, 10 = strong)
salesforce Japan is a collaboration member of JDSA. Scored 4 because it is a supporting member (Japan specific) (As of September 2022)
not specified
--no extract--
InfluenceMap Data Point on Corporate - Influencer Relationship
(1 = weak, 10 = strong)
Salesforce Japan Co., Ltd is a member of the Japanese Department Stores Association (updated May 2022)
not specified
InfluenceMap Data Point on Corporate - Influencer Relationship
(1 = weak, 10 = strong)
salesforce Japan is a collaboration member of JDSA. Scored 4 because it is a supporting member (Japan specific) (As of September 2022)
not specified
--no extract--
InfluenceMap Data Point on Corporate - Influencer Relationship
(1 = weak, 10 = strong)
Salesforce Japan Co., Ltd is a member of the Japanese Department Stores Association (updated May 2022)
not specified
In this section, we depict graphically the relationships the corporation has with trade associations, federations, advocacy groups and other third parties who may be acting on their behalf to influence climate change policy. Each of the columns above represents one relationship the corporation appears to have with such a third party. In these columns, the top, dark section represents the strength of the relationship the corporation has with the influencer. For example if a corporation's senior executive also held a key role in the trade association, we would deem this to be a strong relationship and it would be on the far left of the chart above, with the weaker ones to the right. Click on these grey shaded upper sections for details of these relationships. The middle section contains a link to the organization score details of the influencer concerned, so you can see the details of its climate change policy influence. Click on the middle sections for for details of the trade associations. The lower section contains the organization score of that influencer, the lower the more negatively it is influencing climate policy.
Climate Lobbying Overview: Salesforce has largely positive engagement with climate change policy at both the federal and state level in the US, supporting recent measures such as the Inflation Reduction Act. The company’s direct engagement is at odds with its indirect influence through industry associations, as it remains a member of multiple groups with highly negative engagement, such as the National Association of Manufacturers where a Salesforce executive sits on the Board.
Top-line Messaging on Climate Policy: Salesforce has taken a strong top-line stance in favor of climate change policy in both the EU and US. The company supported global GHG emissions reductions in line with a 1.5°C target in its Global Climate Policy Principles, released in 2021. In the US, Salesforce supported multiple iterations of the federal reconciliation bills, including stating in October 2021 that it was willing to accept the pay-for provisions of the Build Back Better Act in order to successfully pass the climate measures in the bill. In May 2022, CEO Marc Benioff signed an open letter to EU President Ursula von der Leyen supporting an “ambitious an effective” Fit for 55 package. The company also clearly supports the Paris Agreement, as evident in its FY21 Stakeholder report in which it detailed support for the U.S. to rejoin the Paris Agreement and advocated for more ambitious nationally determined contributions leading up to COP26.
Engagement with Climate-Related Policy: Salesforce has positive engagement with specific climate policy in both the US and EU from 2018-2022. In the EU, Salesforce CEO Marc Benioff signed a May 2022 open letter to EU President Ursula von der Leyen advocating for more ambitious reforms to the EU ETS, Energy Efficiency Directive, and Renewable Energy Directive. In July 2022, Salesforce EVP and Chief Impact Officer Suzanne DiBianca published an Op-Ed for CNN lamenting the lapse in congressional negotiations on the Build Back Better Act as well as the Supreme Court verdict on West Virginia v. EPA, which limited the power of the EPA to regulate greenhouse gas emissions. Earlier that year, in January 2022, Salesforce joined a group of companies in filing an amicus brief with the Supreme Court supporting the powers of the EPA in the West Virginia case. As an active member of the Ceres BICEP Network, Ceres has also signed multiple joint letters in support of specific policies at the federal and state level, such as a May 2022 letter urging policymakers to strengthen federal standards for GHG emissions from medium and heavy-duty vehicles.
Positioning on Energy Transition: Salesforce offers frequent support for the transition to a low-carbon economy and energy system, particularly via joint letters to policymakers. In July 2022, it endorsed the U.S. Inflation Reduction Act in a statement to Protocol. In advance of COP26 in October 2021, CEO Marc Benioff joined the Alliance of CEO Climate Leaders in advocating for the removal of fossil fuel subsidies, and in August 2021, Benioff tweeted in support of Costa Rica’s effort to permanently ban oil and gas exploration. In a September 2021 blog post, Salesforce stated support for the Clean Electricity Performance Program as proposed in the US Build Back Better Act. Previously, in a December 2020 Ceres BICEP Letter, Salesforce supported California’s Title 24 Building Energy Efficiency Standards, which would require all-electric construction for new residential buildings in the state.
Industry Association Governance: Salesforce discloses a list of trade associations it is a member of but does not provide details on the company’s role within each group, or any attempts to influence their climate positions. It has not published a formal review of its alignment with its industry associations. Salesforce remains a member of the National Association of Manufacturers, where it serves on the Board of Directors, as well as the U.S. Chamber of Commerce and California Chamber of Commerce, all of which continues to oppose ambitious climate action.
In September 2021, Salesforce Vice President and Global Head of Sustainability Patrick Flynn stated that the US Chamber’s lobbying against the proposed budget reconciliation bill did not align with the company’s position and that Salesforce was working to improve the Chamber’s position on climate. Salesforce is also a member of the Business Roundtable, which lobbies with mixed positions on climate policy, as well as the Business Council of Australia, both of which demonstrate largely negative engagement with climate policy. This summary was last updated in Q4 2022.