Orica

InfluenceMap Score
for Climate Policy Engagement
D+
Performance Band
56%
Organization Score
44%
Relationship Score
Sector:
Industrials
Head​quarters:
Melbourne, Australia
Brands and Associated Companies:
GroundProbe Pty Ltd., Nelson Brothers Mining Services, Minova Bohemia S.R.O.
Official Web Site:
Wikipedia:

Climate Lobbying Overview: Orica broadly supports action on climate change but takes more negative positions on the Australian energy mix, albeit with limited engagement.

Top-line Messaging on Climate Policy: Orica appears to have broadly positive top-line communications on climate policy. In December 2022, Orica published a Climate Action Report in which it supported the global response to pursue efforts to limit temperature rise to 1.5° C, also supporting action “in line with the goals of the Paris Agreement.” In the report, Orica stated support for government policies and programs that provide “fiscal subsidies for early-stage low-emissions technology development,” and carbon pricing generally, but highlighted the need to maintain global competitiveness and prevent carbon leakage.

Engagement with Climate-Related Regulations: Orica appears to have limited engagement with climate-related regulations. The company’s 2021 CDP Disclosure seemed to stress the risks of carbon leakage and the impacts on competitiveness from Alberta’s new emissions trading system, the Technology Innovation and Emissions Reduction System (TIER). In its 2022 Climate Action Report, the company suggested that the EU Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM) should be “non-discriminatory” while acknowledging that carbon border adjustments “could be ... an effective global climate policy.”

Positioning on Energy Transition: Orica does not appear fully supportive of the energy transition. In November 2022 the company’s CEO reportedly supported the role of fossil gas in the energy mix in a Sydney Morning Herald article. Recently, the company made more positive statements on the energy transition as part of the Australian Climate Leaders Coalition, supporting] updates to market rules to aid decarbonization, the deployment of electric vehicle recharging infrastructure, and a significant retirement of coal power by 2030, in a November 2021 joint statement signed by Orica’s CEO Sanjeev Gandhi. Furthermore, in May 2022 the CEO emphasized the importance of decarbonizing the power sector and the company’s 2022 Climate Action Report emphasized the role of green hydrogen for the “transition to a lower-carbon economy”.

Industry Association Governance: Orica disclosed a list of its memberships to industry associations as part of its 2022 Climate Action Report. However, while it flagged that the company is “partially aligned” with some associations, it provided no detail of areas of misalignment and did not disclose the industry associations’ climate change policy positions. An Orica executive sits on the board of the Energy Users Association of Australia, which appears to show limited support for action on climate change. Furthermore, Orica is a member of several negatively engaged industry associations, including the Minerals Council of Australia (MCA) and the NSW Minerals Council.

InfluenceMap collects and assesses evidence of corporate climate policy engagement on a weekly basis, depending on the availability of information from each specific data source (for more information see our methodology). While this analysis flows through to the company’s scores each week, the summary above is updated periodically. This summary was last updated in Q2 2023.

QUERIES
DATA SOURCES
2NSNANSNS2NS
2NSNSNS21NS
01NSNSNSNS1
1NS1NSNS1NS
0NA0NANANANS
0NSNSNSNSNSNS
1NS-10-1NSNS
NSNSNSNSNSNSNS
NSNSNSNSNSNSNS
0NSNS-1-101
NSNSNS-11NSNS
0NA-2NANANANS
NSNSNSNSNSNSNS
Strength of Relationship
STRONG
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
WEAK
 
46%
 
46%
 
39%
 
39%
 
32%
 
32%
 
44%
 
44%
 
42%
 
42%
 
62%
 
62%
 
79%
 
79%

How to Read our Relationship Score Map

In this section, we depict graphically the relationships the corporation has with trade associations, federations, advocacy groups and other third parties who may be acting on their behalf to influence climate change policy. Each of the columns above represents one relationship the corporation appears to have with such a third party. In these columns, the top, dark section represents the strength of the relationship the corporation has with the influencer. For example if a corporation's senior executive also held a key role in the trade association, we would deem this to be a strong relationship and it would be on the far left of the chart above, with the weaker ones to the right. Click on these grey shaded upper sections for details of these relationships. The middle section contains a link to the organization score details of the influencer concerned, so you can see the details of its climate change policy influence. Click on the middle sections for for details of the trade associations. The lower section contains the organization score of that influencer, the lower the more negatively it is influencing climate policy.