Federal Retirement Thrift

Sector

Financials

Headquarters

Washington, D.C., United States

Official Website

frtib.gov

Climate Finance Policy Engagement Analysis

Climate Lobbying Overview: As its remit is very clearly defined by Congress, the Federal Retirement Thrift Investment Board (FRTIB) appears unengaged on climate policy, except for one comment to the Department of Labor in 2022.

Top-Line Messaging on Climate-Related Finance Policy: In its 2022 letter to the Department of Labor, FRTIB recognized climate change as a systemic market risk and appeared to support reform to deliver a sustainable financial system.

Position on Regulated Corporate Climate Disclosure: In the same 2022 letter, FRTIB appeared supportive of the SEC’s efforts to regulate and standardize climate disclosures.

Position on Incorporating Climate Factors Into Investor Duties: In its letter to the Department of Labor on Possible Agency Actions to Protect Life Savings and Pensions from Threats of Climate-Related Financial Risk, FRTIB cautioned the Department against taking any steps to address climate risk that might “override the unambiguously expressed authority of Congress,” including auditing the appropriateness of Thrift Savings Plan (TSP) investment options, exposure to climate risk, or encouraging “more effective incorporation of climate-related financial risks into TSP.”

Industry Association Governance: FRTIB has not disclosed direct or indirect engagement with sustainable finance policy. InfluenceMap’s database has not identified any membership to industry associations.

InfluenceMap collects and assesses evidence of corporate climate policy engagement on a weekly basis, depending on the availability of information from each specific data source (for more information see our methodology). While this analysis flows through to the company’s scores each week, the summary above is updated periodically. This summary was last updated in Q2 2024.

Show More

InfluenceMap Score for Climate Finance Policy Engagement

N/A

Performance Band

N/A

Organization Score

N/A

Relationship Score

3%

Engagement Intensity

Primary Evidence

All primary evidence used to inform the analysis of Federal Retirement Thrift can be found in the two tabs below below. In the first tab, hyperlinks in each cell of the matrix provide access to evidence collected on Federal Retirement Thrift's direct policy engagement activities. The second tab provides a record of any links between Federal Retirement Thrift and the Industry Associations stored in the LobbyMap database.

DATA SOURCES
QUERIES
Main Web Site

Main Web Site

Corporate Media

Corporate Media

CDP Responses

CDP Responses

Direct Consultation with Governments

Direct Consultation with Governments

Media Reports

Media Reports

CEO Messaging

CEO Messaging

Financial Disclosures

Financial Disclosures

Reforming the financial sector: Does the organization support the need for systemic reforms to deliver a sustainable financial system?

NSNSNS1NSNSNS

Climate Science Stance: Does the organization support a science-based response to the climate crisis?

NSNSNSNSNSNSNS

Need for climate policy: Does the organization support the need for climate-related finance regulation?

NSNSNSNSNSNSNS

Disclosures: Does the organization support regulated corporate climate disclosure?

NSNSNS1NSNSNS

Taxonomies: Does the organization support a taxonomy?

NSNSNSNSNSNSNS

Financial Products and Ratings: Does the organization support climate standards, labels and/or benchmarks for financial products and policy on ESG ratings?

NSNSNSNSNSNSNS

Investor Duties: Does the organization support policy to incorporate climate factors into investor duties?

NSNSNS-1NSNSNS

Prudential Regulation: Does the organization support policy to incorporate climate factors into risk management/ prudential regulation?

NSNSNSNSNSNSNS

Real Economy Climate Regulations: the organization support real economy climate policy and regulation?

NSNSNSNSNSNSNS

Energy, Industry and Land Transitions: Does the company support energy, industry and land transitions as required by the IPCC?

NSNSNSNSNSNSNS

Disclosure on Lobbying: Is the organization being transparent about their positions on climate legislation and policy?

-2NS-2NSNSNSNS

Disclosure on Relationships: Are companies being transparent about their business associations which may impact climate debate and policy?

-2NS-2NSNSNSNS