Coterra Energy

InfluenceMap Score
for Climate Policy Engagement
E
Performance Band
32%
Organization Score
28%
Relationship Score
Sector:
Energy
Head​quarters:
Houston , United States
Official Web Site:
Wikipedia:

Climate Lobbying Overview: Coterra Energy (“Coterra”) has moderate levels of engagement with climate policy and holds broadly negative positions. Coterra has been particularly vocal in its support for the long-term use of oil and fossil gas in the energy mix, and has advocated to weaken US methane emissions regulations.

Top-line Messaging on Climate Policy: Coterra appears to have limited top-line communications on climate policy. In the organization’s 2022 annual SEC Filing, published in February 2023, Coterra acknowledged the risk of climate change regulation, but did not take a clear position on it. In the same report, Coterra acknowledged, but did not take a clear position on the Paris Agreement. Coterra does not appear to explicitly support the Paris Agreement, emissions reductions in line with IPCC guidelines, or the need for government regulation to respond to climate change.

Engagement with Climate-Related Regulations: Coterra appears to have limited, but negative, engagement with climate-related regulation. In a consultation response to the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) in February 2023, the company opposed the proposed extension of methane emissions regulation, which entailed applying existing methane emissions regulations to polluting sources not before included; legislating for the use of advanced pollution detection methods, and imposing implementation requirements, including timelines, on states to limit methane pollution under the Clean Air Act (CAA). Furthermore, in a February 2023 joint letter to the EPA, Coterra opposed the extended use of Optical Gas Imaging (OGI) follow-up surveys to detect fugitive methane emissions in the atmosphere, claiming that they were ‘unnecessary or impractical’.

Positioning on Energy Transition: Coterra has been actively and negatively engaged on the energy transition, disclosing strong support for the long-term use of fossil gas. In a blog post uploaded by the company in February 2023, Coterra framed fossil gas as a ‘clean energy’, and emphasized concerns around the technical feasibility of a move away from fossil fuels in the energy mix. Furthermore, in a statement addressed to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) in May 2022, Coterra supported the development of 'responsibly sourced gas' (RSG), a title created by the Tennessee Pipeline Company intended to support the buying and selling of 'low emission' fossil gas. According to an article published by Politico in June 2022, Coterra then ‘pushed back’ on FERC’s decision to reject the RSG proposal.

Industry Association Governance: Coterra disclosed membership of a number of industry associations through its 2022 Sustainability Report, but failed to disclose any further details as to the type of membership and/or role held within these industry associations. The company has not published an audit of its industry association memberships and climate lobbying. Coterra is a member of the American Petroleum Institute (API) which is actively and negatively engaged on climate policy.

QUERIES
DATA SOURCES
NSNSNSNSNSNS0
NSNSNSNSNSNSNS
NSNSNSNSNSNS0
NSNSNSNSNSNS0
-2NS-2NSNSNSNS
NSNSNSNSNSNSNS
NSNSNSNSNSNSNS
NSNSNSNSNSNS0
NSNSNSNSNSNSNS
-1-1NS-1-2-1NS
NSNSNS-1NSNSNS
0NS-2NSNSNSNS
NSNSNSNSNSNSNS
Strength of Relationship
STRONG
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
WEAK
 
33%
 
33%
 
23%
 
23%
 
24%
 
24%

How to Read our Relationship Score Map

In this section, we depict graphically the relationships the corporation has with trade associations, federations, advocacy groups and other third parties who may be acting on their behalf to influence climate change policy. Each of the columns above represents one relationship the corporation appears to have with such a third party. In these columns, the top, dark section represents the strength of the relationship the corporation has with the influencer. For example if a corporation's senior executive also held a key role in the trade association, we would deem this to be a strong relationship and it would be on the far left of the chart above, with the weaker ones to the right. Click on these grey shaded upper sections for details of these relationships. The middle section contains a link to the organization score details of the influencer concerned, so you can see the details of its climate change policy influence. Click on the middle sections for for details of the trade associations. The lower section contains the organization score of that influencer, the lower the more negatively it is influencing climate policy.