CSX Corp

Sector

Industrials

Headquarters

Jacksonville, United States

Wikipedia

CSX Corp

Climate Policy Engagement Analysis

Climate Policy Engagement Overview: CSX Corp (CSX) appears to have very low engagement with US climate policy, with limited evidence and disclosure of its recent climate policy positioning and engagement in 2018-22. Historically, CSX appears to have funded organizations promoting climate change denial, including America’s Power (formerly ACEEE), of which it no longer appears to be a member as of 2022.

Top-line Messaging on Climate Policy: CSX Corp's top-line messaging on its corporate website as of 2022 appears to recognize some of the science of climate change. CSX’s communications around climate change in its 2020 ESG report do not take a clear position on IPCC-aligned emissions reductions. CSX has not disclosed clear positions on the Paris Agreement or climate regulations in its top-line messaging.

Engagement with Climate-Related Regulations: In 2018-22, CSX appears to have had limited engagement with US climate policy. CSX does not seem to disclose its positions towards, or engagement with, climate policy on its website. In a Q4 2018 Senate Lobbying Disclosure, the company disclosed it had engaged on the Clean Power Plan, although with an unspecified position.

Positioning on Energy Transition: CSX appears to have limited disclosure on the energy transition in 2018-20, although messaging on its corporate website in 2020 suggests support for fracking. In 2017 CSX’s former CEO, Hunter Harrison, stated that “fossil fuels are dead. That’s a long-term view. It’s not going to happen overnight. It’s not going to be in two or three years. But it’s going away, in my view.” This statement appears more supportive of the energy transition compared to previous communications, with CSX’s former CEO Michael Ward communicating in 2016, referring to Donald Trump, that “we certainly like his policy on coal."

Industry Association Governance: CSX does appear to publicly disclose a list of its memberships to industry associations on its website, but without clarity on policy positions and its influence within associations. The company discloses the membership of only one trade association in its 2021 CDP response. CSX has not published a review of its alignment with its industry associations.

Show More

InfluenceMap Score for Climate Policy Engagement

E+

Performance Band

39%

Organization Score

N/A

Relationship Score

5%

Engagement Intensity

Primary Evidence

All primary evidence used to inform the analysis of CSX Corp can be found in the two tabs below below. In the first tab, hyperlinks in each cell of the matrix provide access to evidence collected on CSX Corp's direct policy engagement activities. The second tab provides a record of any links between CSX Corp and the Industry Associations stored in the LobbyMap database.

DATA SOURCES
QUERIES
Main Web Site

Main Web Site

Corporate Media

Corporate Media

CDP Responses

CDP Responses

Direct Consultation with Governments

Direct Consultation with Governments

Media Reports

Media Reports

CEO Messaging

CEO Messaging

Financial Disclosures

Financial Disclosures

Communication of Climate Science

1NSNANS-2NS1

Alignment with IPCC on Climate Action

0NSNSNSNSNSNS

Supporting the Need for Regulations

NSNSNSNSNSNSNS

Support of UN Climate Process

NSNSNSNSNSNSNS

Transparency on Legislation

-2NA-1NANANANS

Carbon Tax

NSNSNSNSNSNSNS

Emissions Trading

NSNSNSNSNSNSNS

Energy and Resource Efficiency

NSNS0NSNSNSNS

Renewable Energy

NSNSNSNSNSNSNS

Energy Transition & Zero Carbon Technologies

-1NSNSNS0NS0

GHG Emission Regulation

NSNSNS0-2NS0

Disclosure on Relationships

0NA-1NANANANS

Land Use

NSNSNSNSNSNSNS