Softbank Group

InfluenceMap Score
B
Performance Band
79%
Organisation Score
63%
Relationship Score
Sector:
Telecommunications
Head​quarters:
Tokyo, Japan
Brands and Associated Companies:
Softbank, Z Holdings Corporation, LINE, Arm
Official Web Site:
Wikipedia:

Climate Lobbying Overview: Softbank Group has had some active engagement with climate policies, appearing to take a positive position on energy transition and GHG emissions reduction targets in Japan.

Top-line Messaging on Climate Policy: Softbank Group appears to have positive positions in its top-line messaging on climate action. The company showed recognition on some of the science of climate change in its sustainability report published in September 2021. In its annual report published in July 2021, Softbank Group voiced broad support for efforts towards more ambitious GHG emissions reductions. In June 2022, as a member of Japan Climate Initiative (JCI), Softbank Group co-signed a joint statement which supports UNFCCC process to limit global warming below 1.5 °C.

Engagement with Climate-Related Regulations: Softbank Group appears to have active engagement with renewable energy regulations and GHG emissions targets, yet limited engagement with other climate-related regulations. In its response on CDP 2021 Climate Change accessed October 2022, Softbank Group appeared to support increased ambition of renewable energy legislation and targets, stating "we have made requests to the government to contribute to the diffusion and expansion of renewable energy.” In April 2021, Softbank Group was a signatory of a statement submitted to the Japanese government by the JCI demanding to “strengthen its greenhouse gas reduction target from the current 26% to an ambitious level of at least 45%.”.

Positioning on Energy Transition: Softbank Group appears to hold positive positions on transitioning the energy mix. At International Conference REvision2022 in March 2022 hosted by Renewable Energy Institute, Softbank Group’s CEO Masayoshi Son advocated for the urgent decarbonization of the power sector. In January 2021, Softbank Group was a signatory to a JCI statement submitted to the Japanese government that called for “a 40-50% renewable energy electricity target for FY2030 in the next Basic Energy Plan to be formulated this year.”

Industry Association Governance: Softbank Group has not fully disclosed a list of its industry association memberships in its corporate website. In its 2021 CDP response, the company fully disclose its climate change policy positions, and disclosed some membership to the Renewable Energy Council (REC) but failed to disclose others found by InfluenceMap to have opposed progressive climate policy, such as Keidanren.

QUERIES
DATA SOURCES
1NSNANSNSNS1
12NSNSNSNSNS
NSNSNSNSNSNSNS
NS2NSNSNSNSNS
2NA1NANANANA
NSNSNSNSNSNSNS
NSNSNSNSNSNSNS
0NSNSNSNSNSNS
222NS2NSNS
222NS11NS
12NSNSNSNSNS
0NS-1NANANANS
NSNSNSNSNSNSNS
Strength of Relationship
STRONG
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
WEAK
 
50%
 
50%
 
83%
 
83%
 
60%
 
60%
 
54%
 
54%
 
88%
 
88%

How to Read our Relationship Score Map

In this section, we depict graphically the relationships the corporation has with trade associations, federations, advocacy groups and other third parties who may be acting on their behalf to influence climate change policy. Each of the columns above represents one relationship the corporation appears to have with such a third party. In these columns, the top, dark section represents the strength of the relationship the corporation has with the influencer. For example if a corporation's senior executive also held a key role in the trade association, we would deem this to be a strong relationship and it would be on the far left of the chart above, with the weaker ones to the right. Click on these grey shaded upper sections for details of these relationships. The middle section contains a link to the organization score details of the influencer concerned, so you can see the details of its climate change policy influence. Click on the middle sections for for details of the trade associations. The lower section contains the organization score of that influencer, the lower the more negatively it is influencing climate policy.