Northrop Grumman

InfluenceMap Score
D
Performance Band
n/a
Organisation Score
35%
Relationship Score
Sector:
Industrials
Head​quarters:
United States
Official Web Site:

Climate Lobbying Overview: Northrop Grumman appears to have no engagement with climate change policy. However, the company retains memberships to several industry associations actively and negatively engaged on climate change such as the US Chamber of Commerce and National Association of Manufacturers.

Top-line Messaging on Climate Policy: Northrop Grumman has limited top-line communications on climate change. In its 2020 Sustainability Report, the company acknowledged the physical climate-related impacts of climate change such as extreme weather events. However, InfluenceMap did not find any messaging on the Paris Agreement, the need for economy-wide emissions reductions in line with the IPCC, or the need for government regulation to respond to climate change.

Engagement with Climate-Related Regulations: Northrop Grumman does not appear to disclose its climate-related policy positions and lobbying activities on its corporate website or via its 2020 CDP response. InfluenceMap did not find any evidence of engagement with specific climate-related regulations.

Positioning on Energy Transition: InfluenceMap did not find any evidence of engagement with policy related to the energy mix from Northrop Grumman.

Industry Association Governance: Northrop Grumman discloses its payments to US industry associations on its corporate website. However, the company does not disclose any further details regarding its role within each association or their climate policy positions. Northrop Grumman has not published a review of its industry associations to date. Northrop Grumman is a member of the US Chamber of Commerce and is on the board of directors of the National Association of Manufacturers, both of which have engaged negatively on climate policy. Northrop Grumman is also a member of the Business Roundtable which engages on climate policy with mixed, but increasingly positive, positions.

QUERIES
DATA SOURCES
1NSNANSNSNSNS
NSNSNSNSNSNSNS
NSNSNSNSNSNSNS
NSNSNSNSNSNSNS
-2NA-1NANANANS
NSNSNSNSNSNSNS
NSNSNSNSNSNSNS
NSNSNSNSNSNSNS
NSNSNSNSNSNSNS
NSNSNSNSNSNSNS
NSNSNSNSNSNSNS
0NA0NANANANS
NSNSNSNSNSNSNS
Strength of Relationship
STRONG
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
WEAK
 
63%
 
63%
 
30%
 
30%
 
28%
 
28%
 
52%
 
52%

How to Read our Relationship Score Map

In this section, we depict graphically the relationships the corporation has with trade associations, federations, advocacy groups and other third parties who may be acting on their behalf to influence climate change policy. Each of the columns above represents one relationship the corporation appears to have with such a third party. In these columns, the top, dark section represents the strength of the relationship the corporation has with the influencer. For example if a corporation's senior executive also held a key role in the trade association, we would deem this to be a strong relationship and it would be on the far left of the chart above, with the weaker ones to the right. Click on these grey shaded upper sections for details of these relationships. The middle section contains a link to the organization score details of the influencer concerned, so you can see the details of its climate change policy influence. Click on the middle sections for for details of the trade associations. The lower section contains the organization score of that influencer, the lower the more negatively it is influencing climate policy.