Nordea

InfluenceMap Score
for Sustainable Finance
C+
Performance Band
73%
Organisation Score
53%
Relationship Score
Sector:
Financials
Head​quarters:
Helsinki, Finland
Brands and Associated Companies:
Nordea Asset Management
Official Web Site:
Wikipedia:

Sustainable Finance Lobbying Overview: Nordea appears to be fairly active in advocating for regulation on sustainable finance.

Top-line Messaging on Sustainable Finance Policy: Nordea has stated support for the goals of the Paris Agreement and limiting global temperature to 2C, and appears to support systemic reform to create a more sustainable financial system. Nordea has stated broad support for the EU’s Action Plan on Sustainable Finance on its website and in its CDP response.

Position on Regulated Corporate ESG Disclosure: In 2019-20, Nordea stated support for the update to the non-binding guidelines for reporting climate-related information under the EU Non-Financial Reporting Directive (NFRD) in a website article and CDP response. In 2021, Nordea supported the SEC's role in mandating corporate ESG disclosure, and in response to the SEC’s consultation, Nordea offered strong support, including a requirement to disclose Scope 3 emissions and a link between executive pay and climate-related goals. In 2022, it supported mandatory implementation of the Task Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosures (TCFD) and 1.5 pathway-aligned transition plans as part of a global investor statement to governments. During the Biodiversity COP15 in 2022, it also supported aligning disclosure frameworks with the Taskforce on Nature-related Financial Disclosures (TNFD). In 2022, it also advocated for greater ambition in response to the IFRS Sustainability Disclosure Standards Exposure Drafts.

Position on Taxonomies: Between 2019-22, Nordea consistently stated support for the taxonomy in multiple website articles, through social media and in media articles.

Position on ESG Standards, Labels & Benchmarks: Nordea has been active in supporting an EU Green Bond Standard (EU GBS), with Nordea's executive adviser on sustainability Aila Aho serving as rapporteur for the EU GBS subgroup of the European Commission's Technical Expert Group (TEG). During 2020-2021, it t also supported the EU GBS in a website article, social media, and CDP responses.

Position on Integrating ESG into Investor Duties: Similarly, during 2021, Nordea has been supportive of the Sustainable Finance Disclosure Regulation (SFDR) on its website and a media article.

Lobbying Transparency: Nordea has disclosed some sustainable finance policy positions in website articles, but does not appear to have a clear dedicated disclosure of its engagement. Nordea has also disclosed its trade association memberships but has not given any further details of its governance of indirect influence.

QUERIES
DATA SOURCES
10NS120NS
120NS11NS
1NS002NSNS
11121NSNS
11101NSNS
2111NSNSNS
1NSNS11NSNS
NSNSNSNSNSNSNS
0NANANANANANA
0NANANANANANA
Strength of Relationship
STRONG
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
WEAK
 
42%
 
42%
 
50%
 
50%
 
52%
 
52%
 
56%
 
56%
 
46%
 
46%
 
81%
 
81%

How to Read our Relationship Score Map

In this section, we depict graphically the relationships the corporation has with trade associations, federations, advocacy groups and other third parties who may be acting on their behalf to influence climate change policy. Each of the columns above represents one relationship the corporation appears to have with such a third party. In these columns, the top, dark section represents the strength of the relationship the corporation has with the influencer. For example if a corporation's senior executive also held a key role in the trade association, we would deem this to be a strong relationship and it would be on the far left of the chart above, with the weaker ones to the right. Click on these grey shaded upper sections for details of these relationships. The middle section contains a link to the organization score details of the influencer concerned, so you can see the details of its climate change policy influence. Click on the middle sections for for details of the trade associations. The lower section contains the organization score of that influencer, the lower the more negatively it is influencing climate policy.