Mitsubishi Electric

InfluenceMap Score
D+
Performance Band
n/a
Organisation Score
56%
Relationship Score
Sector:
Industrials
Head​quarters:
Tokyo, Japan

Climate Lobbying Overview Mitsubishi Electric’s top-line position appear to recognize climate change, but it does not strategically engage on actions towards climate change, nor engage on climate change policies. The company recognizes the world trend of climate change, but the concrete strategy is unclear.

Top-line Messaging on Climate Policy: Mitsubishi Electric appear to have some interest on climate change in its top-line messaging. In 2020, Mitsubishi Electric have stated in their 2020 Sustainability Report that since 2019, they have promoted its 9th Environmental Plan accordingly to Paris Agreement. It also demonstrates its recognition towards climate change in on the company’s 2020 Sustainability Report.

Engagement with Climate-Related Regulations: Mitsubishi Electric appears to have limited engagement with specific climate-related regulations. InflueneMap was unable to find the evidence related to this.

Positioning on Energy Transition: In 2021 Environmental Report, Mitsubishi Electric have stated the support for transition of energy mix by supplying the power industry with products and systems that do not emit CO2, including solar power and nuclear power systems. In a February 2022 response to a survey from the European Environmental Bureau, Mitsubishi Electric stated support to phase out subsidies for fossil-powered boilers and water heaters in the EU by 2021, alongside supporting the phase out of fossil-powered boilers in the EU "between now and 2030", with an oil boiler phase out by 2023.

Industry Association Governance: In its response to the CDP 2020 Climate Change Information Request, Mitsubishi Electric disclosed its membership with the Liaison Group of Japanese Electric and Electronic Industries for Global Warming Prevention, without referencing specific policy items or describing engagement activities undertaken by the organization. Mitsubishi Electric also appears to have disclosed itself as a member of Japan Electrons and Information Technology Industry Association (JEITA). Mitsubishi Electric did not include any other trade associations of with it is a member, nor does it disclose its trade associations and climate activities on its website. It is also a member of Keidanren, which is negative on most strands of climate policy.

QUERIES
DATA SOURCES
1NSNANSNSNSNS
NSNSNSNSNSNSNS
NS2NSNSNSNSNS
0NSNSNSNSNSNS
-2NA-2NANANANS
NSNSNSNSNSNSNS
NSNSNSNSNSNSNS
NSNSNSNSNSNSNS
NSNSNSNSNSNSNS
12NSNSNSNSNS
NSNSNSNSNSNSNS
-2NA-2NANANANS
NSNSNSNSNSNSNS
Strength of Relationship
STRONG
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
WEAK
 
41%
 
41%
 
54%
 
54%
 
53%
 
53%
 
59%
 
59%
 
59%
 
59%
 
78%
 
78%
 
66%
 
66%
 
53%
 
53%
 
46%
 
46%
 
61%
 
61%
 
48%
 
48%
 
50%
 
50%

How to Read our Relationship Score Map

In this section, we depict graphically the relationships the corporation has with trade associations, federations, advocacy groups and other third parties who may be acting on their behalf to influence climate change policy. Each of the columns above represents one relationship the corporation appears to have with such a third party. In these columns, the top, dark section represents the strength of the relationship the corporation has with the influencer. For example if a corporation's senior executive also held a key role in the trade association, we would deem this to be a strong relationship and it would be on the far left of the chart above, with the weaker ones to the right. Click on these grey shaded upper sections for details of these relationships. The middle section contains a link to the organization score details of the influencer concerned, so you can see the details of its climate change policy influence. Click on the middle sections for for details of the trade associations. The lower section contains the organization score of that influencer, the lower the more negatively it is influencing climate policy.