Manulife Financial Corporation

InfluenceMap Score
for Sustainable Finance Policy Engagement
B-
Performance Band
86%
Organization Score
44%
Relationship Score

Sector:
Financials
Head​quarters:
Toronto, Canada
Official Web Site:
Wikipedia:

Sustainable Finance Lobbying Overview: Manulife Financial Corporation (Manulife) appears to have had limited but generally positive engagement on sustainable finance policies, generally supporting the need for regulated corporate climate disclosures and opposing efforts to limit shareholder rights.

Top-Line Messaging on Sustainable Finance Policy: Manulife has recognized the risk climate change poses to the financial system, but it is unclear whether it supports systemic reforms to address this. In 2022, Manulife signed onto The Investor Agenda’s Global Investor Statement to Governments on the Climate Crisis, calling on governments to take action to limit temperature rise to 1.5C. Manulife Investment Management appears supportive of sustainable finance regulation in its 2022 Stewardship Report.

Position on Regulated Corporate ESG Disclosure: Manulife has been supportive of the need for disclosure regulation, while taking more mixed positions on specific policies. In its Climate Change Statement Manulife stated support for mandatory climate disclosure in line with the TCFD, and in its 2022 Stewardship Report supported the establishment of the International Sustainability Standards Board and a global baseline for sustainability disclosures. In response to the Securities and Exchange Commission’s (SEC) request for input on climate change disclosure in June 2021, Manulife called on the Commission to mandate disclosure, advocating for a phase-in of Scope 3 emissions disclosure requirements. After the SEC released its climate disclosure proposal, Manulife outlined general support for the rule but again advocated for delaying implementation of Scope 3 requirements. In its 2022 CDP Response Manulife reported that it is encouraging its industry associations to take a “forward looking approach” to climate disclosure policies.

Position on Incorporating ESG Factors Into Investor Duties: In 2020, Manulife opposed a Trump-era Department of Labor rule that sought to limit shareholder rights. Manulife also signed onto comment letters spearheaded by the Canadian Coalition for Good Governance that opposed a Trump-era rule that sought to limit ESG investing and strongly supported the Biden-era Department of Labor regulation that reversed earlier rules and permitted the use of ESG factors in fiduciaries’ decision making and exercise of shareholder rights.

Industry Association Governance: Manulife has disclosed its industry association membership and given some details of its engagement with these groups on sustainable finance policies, but does not appear to have assessed whether these industry groups are aligned with Manulife’s positions or 1.5C.

QUERIES
DATA SOURCES
0NSNSNSNSNSNS
NS2NSNSNSNSNS
1NSNSNSNSNSNS
120-1NSNSNS
NSNSNSNSNSNSNS
NSNSNSNSNSNSNS
NSNSNS2NSNSNS
NS2NSNSNSNSNS
0NSNSNSNSNSNS
0NSNSNSNSNSNS
Strength of Relationship
STRONG
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
WEAK
 
N/A
 
57%
 
44%
 
44%
 
48%
 
48%
 
58%
 
58%
 
60%
 
60%
 
37%
 
37%
 
41%
 
41%

How to Read our Relationship Score Map

In this section, we depict graphically the relationships the corporation has with trade associations, federations, advocacy groups and other third parties who may be acting on their behalf to influence climate change policy. Each of the columns above represents one relationship the corporation appears to have with such a third party. In these columns, the top, dark section represents the strength of the relationship the corporation has with the influencer. For example if a corporation's senior executive also held a key role in the trade association, we would deem this to be a strong relationship and it would be on the far left of the chart above, with the weaker ones to the right. Click on these grey shaded upper sections for details of these relationships. The middle section contains a link to the organization score details of the influencer concerned, so you can see the details of its climate change policy influence. Click on the middle sections for for details of the trade associations. The lower section contains the organization score of that influencer, the lower the more negatively it is influencing climate policy.