Foxconn

InfluenceMap Score
n/a
n/a
Organisation Score
n/a
Relationship Score
Sector:
Information Technology
Head​quarters:
Taipei, Taiwan
Brands and Associated Companies:
Foxconn
Official Web Site:
Wikipedia:

Climate Lobbying Overview: Hon Hai Precision Industry (trading as Foxconn Technology Group) is a main supplier for various technology companies. Reporting by Bloomberg in August 2020 shows some large technology firms may be pressuring the company to use more renewable energy. Despite some external pressure to act on climate, Foxconn appears to have very low engagement with climate change policy from 2019-22.

Top-line Messaging on Climate Policy: InfluenceMap was unable to find evidence of Foxconn’s top-line messaging on climate policy. Its 2020 CSR report, released in June 2021, the company does not state a clear position on climate change science, IPCC-demanded global emissions reductions, or the Paris Agreement.

Engagement with Climate-Related Regulations: InfluenceMap found no evidence of Foxconn’s recent engagement with climate policy. The company does not appear to disclose its positions toward, or engagement with, various strands of climate policy on its corporate website or its 2021 CDP response.

Positioning on Energy Transition: InfluenceMap did not find evidence of Foxconn’s position on, or engagement with, policy related to the transition of the energy mix.

Industry Association Governance: Foxconn discloses a list of global industry associations to which it belongs, none of which are assessed by InfluenceMap. The company has not published a formal review of its alignment with industry associations on climate policy.

Additional Note: Foxconn is headquartered in Taiwan, where InfluenceMap’s LobbyMap platform can currently only make a provisional assessment of corporate climate policy engagement, due to limited capability to access publicly available data on this issue. As it is possible that InfluenceMap is not yet able to fully capture evidence of Foxconn's climate policy engagement activities, these scores should be considered provisional at this time.

QUERIES
DATA SOURCES
0NSNANSNSNSNS
0NSNSNSNSNSNS
NSNSNSNSNSNSNS
0NSNANSNSNSNS
-2NA0NANANANS
NSNSNANSNSNSNS
0NSNANSNSNSNS
NSNSNANSNSNSNS
NSNSNANSNSNSNS
0NSNANSNSNSNS
NSNSNANSNSNSNS
-1NS-2NANANANS
Strength of Relationship
STRONG
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
WEAK

How to Read our Relationship Score Map

In this section, we depict graphically the relationships the corporation has with trade associations, federations, advocacy groups and other third parties who may be acting on their behalf to influence climate change policy. Each of the columns above represents one relationship the corporation appears to have with such a third party. In these columns, the top, dark section represents the strength of the relationship the corporation has with the influencer. For example if a corporation's senior executive also held a key role in the trade association, we would deem this to be a strong relationship and it would be on the far left of the chart above, with the weaker ones to the right. Click on these grey shaded upper sections for details of these relationships. The middle section contains a link to the organization score details of the influencer concerned, so you can see the details of its climate change policy influence. Click on the middle sections for for details of the trade associations. The lower section contains the organization score of that influencer, the lower the more negatively it is influencing climate policy.