Generali

InfluenceMap Score
for Sustainable Finance
C-
Performance Band
66%
Organisation Score
41%
Relationship Score
Sector:
Financials
Head​quarters:
Trieste, Italy
Brands and Associated Companies:
Generali Investments
Official Web Site:
Wikipedia:

Sustainable Finance Lobbying Overview: Generali appears to have had limited engagement with sustainable finance policy.

Top-line Messaging on Sustainable Finance Policy: Generali has stated support for keeping global warming below 1.5C and for net-zero by 2050. It is also part of the Net-Zero Asset Owners Alliance and Net-Zero Insurance Alliance.

Position on Sustainable Finance Policy: In feedback to the European Commission's consultation on the Renewed Sustainable Finance Strategy in 2020, Generali stated broad support for the taxonomy and the update of the Non-Financial Reporting Directive (NFRD). Similarly, in comments on the revision of the NFRD in 2020, it supported mandatory disclosures for SMEs and the expansion of scope to a wider range of companies. However, in response to the European Financial Reporting Advisory Group (EFRAG) on the European Sustainability Reporting Standards (ESRS), Generali argued against the number of sector-agnostic disclosure requirements, suggesting they were too granular. It also urged for an ISSB-aligned definition of materiality, which is based on enterprise value rather than double materiality. In website articles in 2021-2022, Generali offered broad support for the EU Taxonomy and the EU Green Bond Standard. Generali has also supported the Sustainable Finance Disclosure Regulation (SFDR) but has highlighted that some of the data required by the regulation is currently inconsistent and calculated according to diverging methodologies.

Lobbying Transparency: Generali has stated that it is engaging with policymakers and has disclosed some activities carried out in climate-related initiatives and working groups, however, it has not described any positions on sustainable finance policies. Generali has disclosed some organizations it is a member of, but with no further details on indirect influence governance. It is also missing key memberships and participation in committee and working groups, such as EuropeanIssuers, Insurance Europe and European Fund and Asset Management Association (EFAMA).

QUERIES
DATA SOURCES
NSNSNSNSNSNSNS
11NS21NSNS
1NSNSNSNSNSNS
0NSNS0NSNSNS
11NS1NSNSNS
1NSNSNSNSNSNS
0NSNSNSNSNSNS
NSNSNSNSNSNSNS
-1NANANANANANA
0NANANANANANA
Strength of Relationship
STRONG
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
WEAK
 
42%
 
42%
 
48%
 
48%
 
25%
 
25%
 
49%
 
49%
 
46%
 
46%
 
72%
 
72%

How to Read our Relationship Score Map

In this section, we depict graphically the relationships the corporation has with trade associations, federations, advocacy groups and other third parties who may be acting on their behalf to influence climate change policy. Each of the columns above represents one relationship the corporation appears to have with such a third party. In these columns, the top, dark section represents the strength of the relationship the corporation has with the influencer. For example if a corporation's senior executive also held a key role in the trade association, we would deem this to be a strong relationship and it would be on the far left of the chart above, with the weaker ones to the right. Click on these grey shaded upper sections for details of these relationships. The middle section contains a link to the organization score details of the influencer concerned, so you can see the details of its climate change policy influence. Click on the middle sections for for details of the trade associations. The lower section contains the organization score of that influencer, the lower the more negatively it is influencing climate policy.