CJ Corporation

InfluenceMap Score
for Climate Policy Engagement
D
Performance Band
n/a
Organization Score
46%
Relationship Score
Sector:
All Sectors
Head​quarters:
Seoul, South Korea
Official Web Site:
Wikipedia:

Climate Lobbying Overview: CJ Corporation appears to have very limited engagement with climate policy, and weak disclosure of its climate policy positioning and engagement. However, the company is a member of several industry associations, actively and often negatively engaging with climate policy in South Korea.

Top-line Messaging on Climate Policy: InfluenceMap found limited evidence of clear top-line messaging on climate policy by CJ Corporation. In its 2021 ESG Report published in August 2022, the company appeared to support global and national targets for achieving carbon neutrality by 2050.

Engagement with Climate-Related Regulations: InfluenceMap found no evidence of CJ Corporation’s engagement with climate-related regulations.

Positioning on Energy Transition: InfluenceMap found no evidence of CJ Corporation’s engagement with the transition to a low-carbon energy mix.

Industry Association Governance: CJ Corporation did not disclose a list of its industry association memberships, nor the details of the company’s role and climate change positions within industry associations. However, the company holds membership to the Korea Chamber of Commerce and Industry (KCCI), the Korea Enterprises Federation (KEF) and the Korea International Trade Association (KITA).

QUERIES
DATA SOURCES
NSNSNANSNSNSNS
2NSNSNSNSNSNS
NSNSNSNSNSNSNS
NSNSNSNSNSNSNS
-2NA-2NANANANS
NSNSNSNSNSNSNS
NSNSNSNSNSNSNS
NSNSNSNSNSNSNS
NSNSNSNSNSNSNS
NSNSNSNSNSNSNS
NSNSNSNSNSNSNS
-2NA-2NANANANS
NSNSNSNSNSNSNS
Strength of Relationship
STRONG
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
WEAK
 
42%
 
42%
 
50%
 
50%
 
49%
 
49%

How to Read our Relationship Score Map

In this section, we depict graphically the relationships the corporation has with trade associations, federations, advocacy groups and other third parties who may be acting on their behalf to influence climate change policy. Each of the columns above represents one relationship the corporation appears to have with such a third party. In these columns, the top, dark section represents the strength of the relationship the corporation has with the influencer. For example if a corporation's senior executive also held a key role in the trade association, we would deem this to be a strong relationship and it would be on the far left of the chart above, with the weaker ones to the right. Click on these grey shaded upper sections for details of these relationships. The middle section contains a link to the organization score details of the influencer concerned, so you can see the details of its climate change policy influence. Click on the middle sections for for details of the trade associations. The lower section contains the organization score of that influencer, the lower the more negatively it is influencing climate policy.